Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Bank Failures

Bid Summary for Access Bank, Champlin, MN

Access Bank, Champlin, MN
Closing Date: May 7, 2010

Failed Bank Information for Access Bank, Champlin, MN

Winning Bidder:

PrinsBank, Prinsburg, MN

Winning Bid:

All deposits, whole bank -- Asset Discount of $6.1 million, Deposit Premium of 0.02%.

Cover (second place) Bidder:

PrinsBank, Prinsburg, MN

Cover Bid:

All deposits, whole bank with loss share – Asset Discount of 4.97%; Deposit Premium 0.02%.

Other Bidder Names:

CorTrust Bank, Mitchell, SD

Coulee Bank, La Crosse, WI

First Minnesota Bank, Minnetonka, MN

First State Bank of Kensington, Kensington, MN

Ultima Bank, Winger, MN

Other Bids:

All deposits, whole bank with loss share -- Asset Discount of 11.69%, Deposit Premium 0%.

All deposits, whole bank with loss share -- Asset Discount of 9.21%, Deposit Premium 0.5%.

Purchase and Assumption Agreement with Pools -- Asset Discount of 0, Deposit Premium 2.5%.

All deposits, whole bank with loss share -- Asset Discount of 10.47%, Deposit Premium 0%.

All deposits, whole bank with loss share -- Asset Discount of 11.82%, Deposit Premium 0%.

All deposits, whole bank with loss share -- Asset Discount of 10.4105%, Deposit Premium 0%.

All deposits, whole bank with loss share -- Asset Discount of 13.13%, Deposit Premium 0.2%.

Insured deposits, whole bank with loss share -- Asset Discount of 13.13%, Deposit Premium 0.2%.

All deposits, whole bank -- Asset Discount of $13.7 million, Deposit Premium 0.2%.

Insured deposits, whole bank -- Asset Discount of $13.7 million, Deposit Premium 0.2%.

Notes:

  • The winning bidder’s acquisition of all the deposits was the least costly resolution compared to a liquidation alternative and the other bids. The liquidation alternative was valued using valuation models to estimate the market value of the assets. The bids for loss share were valued using a discounted cash flow analysis for the loss share portfolio over the life of the loss share agreement.
  • The Other Bidder Names and the Other Bids are in random order. There is no linkage between bidder names and bids, except in the case of the winning bid and the cover bid.
  • There are more bids than bidders because one or more bidders submitted more than one bid.
  • For more information on the bid disclosure policy, see Failed Financial Institution Bid Disclosure Policy

Back to top

Last Updated: November 16, 2020